TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Daly v. Timon

Augustine M. Daly v. Owen V. Timon

Daly v. Timon, 47 Mo. 516 (1871)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 15, 1871
Judges
Bliss, Other
Citations
47 Mo. 516
Headnotes
1. Practice, civil — Weight of evidence — Referee. — Issues triable by a jury may bo referred to a referee, and in that ease the referee is the sole judge of the weight of evidence, subject to review by the trial court. Appellate courts will not examine his decision touching weight of testimony.
Summary
Appeal from, Si. Louis Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bliss

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action upon an account, and is among the class of cases in which the issues of fact are triable by jury. These issues, by consent of parties, were referred to a referee, and defendant excepted to his report, but it was sustained by the court and judgment rendered upon it. The case is brought here by appeal, and defendant asks us to reverse the judgment for the reason alone that the report of the referee was against the weight of evidence. The trial court had the right for this reason to set aside the report, but it is no error of law to refuse to do so. Issues triable by jury may be submitted to the court or referred to a referee, and in either case the jury, the court, or the referee, are the sole judges of the weight of evidence submitted to them, subject to review as before stated. It is against all principle and precedent for us to interfere unless some error of law is shown in proceedings.

The judgment is affirmed.

The other judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1879–1880: 11885–1886: 11899–1900: 11911–1912: 11917–1918: 118792026peak 1879 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Caruth-Byrnes Hardware Co. v. Wolter91 Mo. 484 (1886)
  2. Johnston v. Star Bucket Pump Co.202 S.W. 1143 (Mo. 1918) · Dissent
  3. State ex rel. Tygard v. Elliott82 Mo. App. 458 (1900)
  4. Rhodes v. Guhman137 S.W. 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 1911)
  5. O'Reilly v. Cleary8 Mo. App. 186 (1879)

Most recent

  1. Johnston v. Star Bucket Pump Co.202 S.W. 1143 (Mo. 1918) · Dissent
  2. Rhodes v. Guhman137 S.W. 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 1911)
  3. State ex rel. Tygard v. Elliott82 Mo. App. 458 (1900)
  4. Caruth-Byrnes Hardware Co. v. Wolter91 Mo. 484 (1886)
  5. O'Reilly v. Cleary8 Mo. App. 186 (1879)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list