TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hedges v. North Missouri Railroad

James Hedges, in Error v. The North Missouri Railroad Company, in Error

Hedges v. North Mo. R.R., 48 Mo. 382 (1871)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 15, 1871
Judges
Other, Wagner
Citations
48 Mo. 382
Headnotes
1. Practice, Supreme Court — Law points not saved and no bill of exceptions, judgment affirmed.— Where no questions of law are raised, and no bill of exceptions is preserved, the judgment will be affirmed.
Summary
Error to Clinton Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wagner

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case presents essentially the same state of facts that was exhibited in the case of Blankenship v. North Mo. R.R., ante, p. 376. There are no questions of law raised or saved at the trial, and no bill of exceptions -preserved.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1892: 118922026peak 1892 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Carder v. Primm52 Mo. App. 102 (1892)

Most recent

  1. Carder v. Primm52 Mo. App. 102 (1892)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list