Blount v. Zink
James Blount v. Nathaniel Zink
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sherwood, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court
Action for recovery of specific personal property. It is impossible to notice the various errors assigned in this case, as it does not appear from the record that the attention of the court below was called to them by a motion for new trial. It is true, that' motions for new trial and in arrest have been copied into the transcript by the clerk, but such motions form ho part of the record, unless made so by being incorporated in the bill of exceptions. (See 1 Mo., 262 ; 10 Mo., 457 ; 11 Mo., 214 ; 15 Mo., 208 ; 21 Mo., 112 ; 22 Mo., 336 ; 25 Mo., 565 ; 36 Mo., 400 ; 37 Mo., 31 ; 51 Mo., 115 ; 52 Mo., 118 .)
Judgment affirmed. • All the judges concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.