TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hodkins v. Taylor

Jas. Hodkins, in Error v. H. M. Taylor, in Error

Hodkins v. Taylor, 59 Mo. 106 (1875)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 15, 1875
Judges
Other, Sherwood, Vories
Citations
59 Mo. 106
Headnotes
1. Writ of error — Final judgment. — "Wtit of error will not lie in the absence of final judgment.
Summary
Error to St. Clair Circuit Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sherwood

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have no jurisdiction over this cause, for the reason that there is no final judgment therein. The writ ofprror must therefore be dismissed;

Judge Vories absent; the other judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1911: 11921: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Missouri Bridge & Iron Co. v. Pacific Lime & Gypsum Co.234 S.W. 797 (Mo. 1921)
  2. Cowhick v. Jackson137 S.W. 1003 (Mo. Ct. App. 1911)

Most recent

  1. Missouri Bridge & Iron Co. v. Pacific Lime & Gypsum Co.234 S.W. 797 (Mo. 1921)
  2. Cowhick v. Jackson137 S.W. 1003 (Mo. Ct. App. 1911)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list