Collins v. Barding
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Sherwood, C. J.
Action on promissory notes, the questions in the case all concerning the pleas of payment and of the statute of limitations. It is impossible lor us to notice the alleged errors, as the motion for a new trial has not been incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Mere ref *497 erence to the page of the transcript will not answer. Motions must be incorporated in the bill in order to be regarded by ns—(Pacific R. R. Co. v. Opel, decided at last term). As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed.
All concur.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.