State ex rel. Merrill v. Burns
The State ex rel. Merrill v. Burns
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ilou&n, J.
— At the August term, 1874, of the Schuyler circuit court, in a suit brought by plaintiff against the defendants upon an administrator’s bond, wherein the defendant, Burns, was principal, and the defendant, Grant, was surety, final judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant, Grant. At the next term of said court, the defendant, Grant, filed a motion to set *228 aside the judgment rendered against him for alleged irregularity in the rendition thereof, and for other causes, which motion was sustained by the court. Thereupon the plaintiff took the present appeal.
When a judgment is arrested, or set aside, no appeal can be taken until another final judgment is entered in the cause. In the present case, the plaintiff, in order to have the action of the trial court, in setting aside a judgment rendered by it at a previous term, reviewed by this court, should have refused to proceed further with the cause, and permitted final judgment to be rendered against him. Garesche v. Emerson, 31 Mo. 258 ; Gilstrap v. Felts, 50 Mo. 431 ; Bowie v. City of Kansas, 51 Mo. 459 .
The appeal is manifestly premature, and must therefore be dismissed.
The other judges concur, except Judge Henry, who did not sit.
Appeal Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.