TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Williamson's Case

Williamson's Case, 67 Mo. 174 (1877)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1877
Judges
Sherwood
Citations
67 Mo. 174
Headnotes
Criminal Law: cumulative sentences: statute construed. Where a prisoner is convicted on the same day under two distinct indictments, and is separately sentenced under each, to a term of imprisonment in the penitentiary, the terms are not concurrent, but one commences when the other ends, and the prisoner is not entitled to be discharged until both have expired. Wag. Stat., p. 513, § 7, (folhwing ex parte Turner 45 Mo. 331).
Summary
Petition for Habeas Corpus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sherwood

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sherwood, C. J.

The petitioner, in the custody of the Warden of the Penitentiary, has been brought before us by writ of habeas corpus. The return to the writ shows that the prisoner was convicted on the same day, under two separate indictments for grand larceny, and separately sentenced under each indictment, to three years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The statute governing cases of this character, is as follows : “When any person shall be convicted of two or more offenses, before sentence shall have been pronounced upon him for either offense, the *175 imprisonment to which he shall be sentenced upon the second or other subsequent conviction, shall commence at the termination of the term of imprisonment to which he shall be adjudged upon prior conviction.” (1 Wag. Stat., p. 513, § 9.) ■

The statute has been complied with in the present instance ; the case of ex parte Turner, ( 45 Mo. 331 ,) is directly in point, and as only a small portion of the second term of the prisoner has expired, the prisoner will be remanded into the custody of the warden.

All concur.

Prisoner Remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1890: 118902026peak 1890 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ex parte Durbin102 Mo. 100 (1890)

Most recent

  1. Ex parte Durbin102 Mo. 100 (1890)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ex parte Turner, 45 Mo. 331 (1870) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list