TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex parte Bryan

Ex parte Bryan, 76 Mo. 253 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1882
Judges
Henry
Citations
76 Mo. 253
Disposition
Writ Denied.
Headnotes
Cumulative Sentences. Where several sentences of imprisonment' are passed on the same day, founded upon successive convictions^ they should be cumulative. E. S. 1879, § 1659.
Summary
Habeas Corpus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Henry

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Henry, J.

The petitioner states that he is illegally detained and confined in the penitentiary of the State of Missouri under four commitments and judgments of the circuit court of Greene county, and that the illegality consists in the fact that the four indictments were pending' against him for felonies alleged to have been committed by him, and that, on his plea of guilty to one of the indictments, he was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, and that subsequently, on his plea of guilty to two of the other indictments, he was successively sentenced, on the one to four years’ imprisonment, and on the-other to two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, and was afterward tried on the fourth indictment, on his plea of not guilty, found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years in the penitentiary, the imprisonment in each case to commence at the termination of the term of *254 imprisonment to which he was adjudged on prior convictions, as prescribed by section 9, article 9, Wagner’s Statutes.

It does not appear from the Warden’s return that the petitioner was sentenced on the plea of guilty to either indictment until the 4th day of December, 1875, at which time he was sentenced under the conviction by the jury on the indictment to which he pleaded not guilty. The propositions of law relied upon by the petitioner’s counsel may be conceded, (Ex parte Meyers, 44 Mo. 281 ,) but the facts, as they appear from the Warden’s return, which are to be taken as true because not denied, bring the case within section 9, supra. Ex parte Kayser, 47 Mo. 253 . The petitioner’s application is denied, and he is remanded to the custody of the Warden.

All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1890: 11911: 11913: 11919: 11923: 11924: 11930: 11931: 118902026peak 1890 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Skinker25 S.W.2d 472 (Mo. 1930)
  2. Ex Parte Thornberry254 S.W. 1087 (Mo. 1923)
  3. Ex Parte Bass40 S.W.2d 457 (Mo. 1931)
  4. Tebbetts v. Rickart158 S.W. 843 (Mo. 1913)
  5. State ex rel. Meininger v. Breuer264 S.W. 1 (Mo. 1924)
  6. Ex parte Durbin102 Mo. 100 (1890)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte Bass40 S.W.2d 457 (Mo. 1931)
  2. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Skinker25 S.W.2d 472 (Mo. 1930)
  3. State ex rel. Meininger v. Breuer264 S.W. 1 (Mo. 1924)
  4. Ex Parte Thornberry254 S.W. 1087 (Mo. 1923)
  5. In re Tartar213 S.W. 94 (Mo. 1919)
  6. Tebbetts v. Rickart158 S.W. 843 (Mo. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ex parte Meyers, 44 Mo. 279 (1869) 22
Ex parte Kayser, 47 Mo. 253 (1871) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list