Wilson v. Haxby
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Norton, J.
The record in this case does not show that any exception was taken either to the action of the trial court in overruling plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial or motion in arrest of judgment, and no error appearing *346 in the record proper, under the authority of the following cases the judgment must, be and is hereby affirmed. City of St. Joseph v. Ensworth, 65 Mo. 628 ; Case v. Fogg, 46 Mo. 44 ; Harrison v. Bartlett, 51 Mo. 170; Dougherty v. Whitehead, 31 Mo. 255 .
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.