Laney v. Sweeney
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Gantt, P. J.
This is an action of ejectment for certain lands in Christian county. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff below. The validity of a judgment for taxes is the ground of contention. The facts are identical with those in Laney v. Garbee, ante, p. 355, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in that cause filed to-day by Judge Macfarlane, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court in this case.
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.