State v. Davis
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Thomas, J.
Defendants were indicted in t.he circuit court of Harrison county for disturbing the peace of a family by loud, offensive and indecent conversation, and by threatening, challenging and fighting. Being tried and convicted,- they appealed to the Kansas City court of appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court, and on their motion the case was transferred to this court, on the ground that the decision was in conflict with the opinion,of the St. Louis court of appeals in the case of State v. Bach, 25 Mo. App. 554 . But as the opinion in State v. Bach has been overruled by the St. Louis court of appeals in State v. McDaniel, 40 Mo. App. 356 ; State v. Fare, 39 Mo. App. 110 ; State v. Parker, 39 Mo. App. 116 , and State v. Buck, 43 Mo. App. 443 , there is now no conflict between the two courts of appeals on the question involved, and hence there is nothing for us to decide, the correct doctrine having been announced in State v. Buck, State v. McDaniel, State v. Fare and State v. Parker, supra. Judgment affirmed.
All of this division concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.