TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Barrett v. Dierkes

THE STATE ex rel. PETER T. BARRETT v. BERNARD DIERKES, Auditor of ST. LOUIS

State ex rel. Barrett v. Dierkes, 113 S.W. 1081 (Mo. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1908
Judges
Graves
Citations
113 S.W. 1081214 Mo. 5921908 Mo. LEXIS 253
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
For the reasons given in State ex rel. Gavigan v. Dierkes, ante, p. 578, the judgment in this ease is affirmed.
Summary
Transferred from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Graves

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GRAVES, J.

This is a companion case of the case of State of Missouri at the relation of William J. Gavigan v. Bernard Dierkes, Auditor, ante, p. 578. • Relator Barrett is one of the attorneys whose employment was attempted to be authorized by the same resolution under which Gavigan based his claim. A reading of the facts in that case will give the facts in this case, save as to the character of work performed. Barrett performed the services of an attorney for the same committee mentióned in the Gavigan case.

For the reasons assigned in the Gavigan case, the .judgment of the trial court is affirmed in this case.

All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11936: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Likes v. City of Rolla167 S.W. 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)
  2. Layne-Western Co. v. Buchanan County85 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1936)

Most recent

  1. Layne-Western Co. v. Buchanan County85 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1936)
  2. Likes v. City of Rolla167 S.W. 645 (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list