Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment, and from an order of the district court denying them a new trial.
Appellants’ brief does not contain any specification of errors relied upon, as required by Rule X of the Rules of this court ( 30 Mont, xxxviii , 82 Pac. ix ). Upon the authority of the following eases the judgment and order are affirmed: (Cole v. Ryan, 24 Mont. 122 , 60 Pac. 991 ; Rehberg v. Greiser, 24 Mont. 487 , 62 Pac. 820 ; Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516 , 71 Pac. 755 ; Larkin v. Butte & Boston C. M. Co., 28 Mont. 41 , 72 Pac. 304 .
Affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Brantly concurs. Mr. Justice Milburn, not having heard the argument, takes no part in the foregoing decision.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.