Pentz v. Corscadden
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff in the court below has attempted to appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint and directing the [1] dismissal of his action. There was not any judgment entered but only a minute entry of the order. The order is not a judgment (Rev. Codes, secs. 6710, 7139; State ex rel. Allen v. Hawkins, 33 Mont. 177 , 82 Pac. 952 ; Lisker v. O’Rourke, 28 Mont. 129 , 72 Pac. 416, 755 ; Butte & B. C. M. Co. v. Montana Ore Fur. Co., 27 Mont. 152 , 69 Pac. 714 ); neither is it one of the enumerated orders from which an appeal can be taken (sec. 7098, Rev. Codes), and therefore this court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.
The pretended appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Chief Justice Brantly and Mr. Justice Sanner concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.