TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Hogue v. O'Brien

State ex rel. Hogue v. O'Brien, 198 P. 1117 (Mont. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Montana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 23, 1921
Docket
No. 4,612
Citations
198 P. 111760 Mont. 1781921 Mont. LEXIS 98
Disposition
Reversed.
Headnotes
Intoxicating Liquors — Search-warrants—Improper Issuance. 1. Search-warrant held improperly issued, under decision in the case of State ex rel. Samlin v. District Court, 59 Mont. 600.
Summary
Appeal from District Court, Ravalli County; R. Lee Mc-Culloch, Judge. Search-warrant proceeding by the State of Montana, on the relation of C. E. Hogue, Sheriff, against W. P. 0 ’Brien and certain intoxicating liquors. From a judgment declaring forfeited a quantity of whisky, and ordering it destroyed, defendant appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

[1] This is a search-warrant proceeding instituted in the district court of Ravalli county by C. E. Hogue, as sheriff, under *179 the provisions of the Prohibition Enforcement Act. It comes before this court on appeal by the defendant from a final judgment rendered by the court, after a hearing upon the return by the sheriff of the warrant, declaring forfeited a quantity of whisky seized thereunder and ordering it destroyed. Though this case was brought here on appeal from the final judgment, and the ease of State of Montana ex rel. Jolm Samlin v. District Court of Custer County, 59 Mont. 600 , 198 Pac. 362 , was an original application for a writ of prohibition, the ultimate question submitted for decision in this ease is the same as that decided in the latter case. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed, and the district court is directed to dismiss the proceeding and order the sheriff to return the whisky seized by him to the defendant.

Beversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 219212026peak 1921 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Green v. Wright201 P. 316 (Mont. 1921)
  2. State ex rel. Goodwin v. Dishmon201 P. 286 (Mont. 1921)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Green v. Wright201 P. 316 (Mont. 1921)
  2. State ex rel. Goodwin v. Dishmon201 P. 286 (Mont. 1921)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Samlin v. Dist. Court, 198 P. 362 (Mont. 1921) 58

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list