TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Lalonde v. Lemkie

STATE ex rel. LALONDE v. LEMKIE, Justice of the Peace

State ex rel. Lalonde v. Lemkie, 202 P. 1109 (Mont. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Montana Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 21, 1921
Docket
No. 4,520
Citations
202 P. 110962 Mont. 511921 Mont. LEXIS 267
Disposition
Dismissed.
Headnotes
Appeal and Error—Prohibition—Order Directing Writ to Issue not Appealable. 1. Under section 7098, Revised Codes, an appeal lies from the final, or formal, judgment granting (or denying) a peremptory writ of prohibition, but - does not lie from an order entered in the minutes of the district court directing the peremptory writ to issue.
Summary
Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clark County; W. H. Poorman, Judge. Application by tbe State, on tbe relation of Octavia Lalonde, for a Writ of Prohibition against A. J. Lemkie, Justice of the Peace of Helena Township, of Lewis and Clark County. From an order directing peremptory writ to issue defendant appeals. Cause submitted on brief of Appellant.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Opinion:

PER CURIAM.

On October 29, 1919, on application of the relatrix, the [1] district court of Lewis and Clark county issued an alternative writ of prohibition in a case pending before defendant as justice of the peace, entitled “State of Montana v. Octavia Lalonde,” and requiring him to show cause on the following day why he should not be restrained absolutely from retaining jurisdiction in the action and from proceeding fur-other therein. Upon defendant’s return and after a hearing thereon, the court entered an order in its minutes directing the *52 peremptory writ to issue, but did not render and cause to be entered a final judgment.

By reference to the provisions of the Revised Codes relating to the issuance of writs of mandamus and prohibition (sections 7213-7230), it will be found that the application in each case must terminate in a final judgment awarding the writ or denying it. Section 7098 enumerates the judgments and .orders from which appeals may be taken. No provision is made by it for an appeal from an order granting or denying the peremptory writ. An appeal is allowed only from the final judgment—that is, the formal judgment by which the application is finally determined. The effort of the defendant to bring the proceeding into this court for review by appeal from the order was entirely abortive. The attempted appeal is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 11939: 11947: 11957: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Bole v. Lay300 P. 238 (Mont. 1931)
  2. In re Blankenbaker's Estate91 P.2d 401 (Mont. 1939)
  3. State ex rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rs187 P.2d 1013 (Mont. 1947) · Dissent
  4. State ex rel. Aho v. Justice Court313 P.2d 542 (Mont. 1957)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Aho v. Justice Court313 P.2d 542 (Mont. 1957)
  2. State ex rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rs187 P.2d 1013 (Mont. 1947) · Dissent
  3. In re Blankenbaker's Estate91 P.2d 401 (Mont. 1939)
  4. State ex rel. Bole v. Lay300 P. 238 (Mont. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list