State ex rel. Deschamps v. District Court
STATE ex rel. DESCHAMPS, Relators v. DISTRICT COURT
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an application for a writ of supervisory control for a review of the decree and judgment of the district court of the fourth judicial district, settling the final account of the executors, and finally settling the estate of Gaspard Deschamps, deceased, by the entry of a decree of final distribution. These relators are the appellants in cause No. 5128, Elzeard Deschamps et al., Appellants, v. Ulrich W. Deschamps and Arthur R. Deschamps, Respondents, ante, p. 207, 212 Pac. 512 . The relators here base their application for the writ upon the theory that the district court should not have entered a final decree of distribution in, and finally closed, the estate of Gaspard Deschamps, deceased, pending the appeal to this court from the order refusing to grant relators’ petition to revoke the letters testamentary issued to Ulrich W. Deschamps and Arthur R. Deschamps.
By reason of the conclusions reached in, and the disposition made of, cause No. 5128, no consideration will be given to the Questions presented to this court by the application for the writ, as the determination of that case is conclusive of the application.
The application is denied and the proceedings are dismissed.
Dismissed....
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.