State v. Opela
State of Nebraska v. John Opela
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dean, J.
It is stipulated by the parties that this case involves substantially the same state of facts and the same propositions of law that are involved in State v. Badherg, ante, p. 816. It is agreed by the parties that the decision in that case shall control in the present case. It follows that the district court, having sustained the demurrer in the present case, erred in so doing. The opinion in this case under the provisions of section 9185, Rev. St. 1913, only determines the law of the case. The exceptions of the county attorney are sustained.
Exceptions sustained.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.