Brooks Rent-A-Car Co. v. Allied Credit Bureau, Inc.
BROOKS RENT-A-CAR CO., INC., and IRVING BELL v. ALLIED CREDIT BUREAU, INC., a Nevada Corporation
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION Per Curiam:
Appellants ask that we set aside a summary judgment entered against them on the basis that a genuine issue of material fact exists. We view this contention as sound and reverse the lower court’s order so that a full trial on the merits might be had.
Respondent, the assignee of various creditors of appellant, brought an action to collect certain debts. In support of a motion for summary judgment and pursuant to NRCP 56(a) *120 respondent offered, in the form of an affidavit, an audit of the accounts of the assignors. The affidavit of appellant Irving Bell was offered which disputed the amounts owing and which indicated that respondent’s audit was made without reference to the payment records of Brooks Rent-A-Car, Inc., of which he was president.
It is clear that if the facts in both affidavits are accepted as true, Turner v. Redfield, 82 Nev. 273 , 416 P.2d 233 (1966), a genuine issue of fact is presented. NRCP 56(e).
Reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.