L. M. Enterprises, Inc. v. Kenny
L. M. ENTERPRISES, INC., dba L & M ENTERPRISES and L & M ENTERPRISES v. JOHN C. KENNY and LORRAINE M. KENNY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*654 OPINION Per Curiam:
Appellants contend we must reverse because the evidence does not support the findings of fact made by the district court. We disagree.
Respondents sought and recovered damages, allegedly caused by appellants’ negligent handling of a damaged houseboat. The district court, in a trial without jury, found that appellants had assumed a duty to beach respondents’ damaged houseboat, had performed that duty in a negligent manner, and such negligence was the proximate cause of respondents’ actual damages. The record contains substantial, though conflicting, evidence to support these findings; thus, they will not be disturbed. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc., 92 Nev. 590 , 555 P.2d 488 (1976).
Other issues raised by appellants are without merit and we need not consider them.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.