TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Manchester Education Ass'n v. Superior Court

Manchester Education Association & a. v. Superior Court & a.

Manchester Educ. Ass'n v. Superior Court, 257 A.2d 23 (N.H. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 4, 1969
Docket
No. 5987
Judges
Griffith
Citations
257 A.2d 23109 N.H. 5131969 N.H. LEXIS 194

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per curiam.

Petition for writ of prohibition by which the plaintiffs seek an order vacating and staying enforcement of a temporary injunction issued by the Superior Court on September 2, 1969 enjoining the plaintiffs herein and all public school teachers in the city of Manchester from engaging in or supporting a strike or work stoppage against the Manchester school system, from taking concerted action to strike against the system and ordering the officers and members of the executive board of the Manchester Education Association to instruct its members to report for work on Wednesday, September 3, 1969. A hearing on the merits of the city’s petition for injunction is to be held by the Superior Court on September 15, 1969.

“Prohibition is an extraordinary writ, the purpose of which *514 is to prevent subordinate courts or other tribunals, officers or persons from usurping or exercising jurisdiction with which they are not vested. The grant of such a writ is within the discretion of this court and should be used with caution and forbearance and then only when the right to relief is clear.” Hillsborough v. Superior Court, 109 N. H. 333, 334. Without passing on the contentions of any of the parties to the controversy we hold that a writ of prohibition should not issue in this case.

Petition denied.

Griffith, J., did not sit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 21975: 11998: 12000: 119742026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Mone719 A.2d 626 (N.H. 1998)
  2. In re Thayer761 A.2d 1052 (N.H. 2000)
  3. Wyman v. Durkin330 A.2d 772 (N.H. 1974)
  4. American Federation of Employees, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover345 A.2d 912 (N.H. 1975)
  5. Durkin v. Hillsborough County Superior Court330 A.2d 777 (N.H. 1974)

Most recent

  1. In re Thayer761 A.2d 1052 (N.H. 2000)
  2. In re Mone719 A.2d 626 (N.H. 1998)
  3. American Federation of Employees, Local No. 572 v. City of Dover345 A.2d 912 (N.H. 1975)
  4. Durkin v. Hillsborough County Superior Court330 A.2d 777 (N.H. 1974)
  5. Wyman v. Durkin330 A.2d 772 (N.H. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list