TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lockhart v. Thomson

Richard S. Lockhart George B. Roberts, Jr., Speaker of the House v. Meldrim Thomson, Jr., Governor Lyle E. Herson James H. Hayes Leon G. Yeaton Louis D'Allesandro Bernard A. Streeter, Jr.

Lockhart v. Thomson, 360 A.2d 123 (N.H. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 30, 1976
Docket
No. 7497
Citations
360 A.2d 123116 N.H. 4151976 N.H. LEXIS 368

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per curiam.

Petition for writ of certiorari requesting this court to declare that the February 18, 1976 policy promulgated by the Governor and Executive Council is beyond the constitutional authority of the Governor and Council and that the application of the policy to plaintiff Lockhart is in violation of his constitutional rights.

Plaintiff Lockhart is an elected member of the house of representatives and further serves as the administrative director of the Seacoast Regional Counseling Center. On May 5, 1976, the State *416 coordinator for drug abuse prevention requested the Governor and Council to approve a contract with the Seacoast Regional Counseling Center for the continued operation of a drug abuse counseling center using federal funds which had been previously accepted by the Governor and Council. The Governor and Council approved the contract, but pursuant to the executive policy of February 18, its approval was conditioned on resignation of plaintiff Lockhart from the New Hampshire House of Representatives pursuant to part (3) of the executive policy.

That part of the policy adopted on February 18, 1976, which was applied to the plaintiff Lockhart was determined to be invalid in the Opinion of the Justices, No. 7493, decided this day. Accordingly, it is unnecessary for us to consider the plaintiffs’ federal constitutional claim and the order is Petition dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list