In re McHale
In re Petition of Ellen McHale (New Hampshire Board of Claims)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Memorandum Opinion
This is a petition for original jurisdiction under Supreme Court Rule 11 regarding the granting of a motion to dismiss a claim pending before the State Board of Claims.
*451 On September 25, 1979, the plaintiff filed a notice of claim arising out of a 1978 accident. The State filed a motion to dismiss the claim based upon the petitioner’s failure to provide notice within 180 days as required by RSA 541-B:14 IV (Supp. 1979). On December 7, 1979, the Board of Claims heard and granted the motion to dismiss. On December 21, 1979, the instant petition was filed in this court and on January 8, 1980, a “motion for reconsideration” was filed with the board.
RSA 541-B:10 IV (Supp. 1979) provides that the “findings and recommendations of the board” shall “only be subject to a judicial appeal... in accordance with RSA 541.” We have previously held that “the legislature has designated the RSA ch. 541 appeals procedure as the proper vehicle for challenges to judgments of the board of claims.” Sousa v. State, 119 N.H. 283, 284 , 401 A.2d 1067, 1068 (1979).
Under RSA 541:3 a motion for rehearing must be filed with the agency within twenty days “after any order or decision” or no appeal may betaken. RSA 541:4. Our Rule 11 procedures are not available to cure an appeal that is defective under RSA ch. 541. See Supreme Court Rule 10.
Petition dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.