TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

P. F. Avery Corp. v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights

P. F. Avery Corporation v. New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights & a.

P. F. Avery Corp. v. N.H. Comm'n for Human Rights, 453 A.2d 1254 (N.H. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 5, 1982
Docket
No. 82-038
Citations
453 A.2d 1254122 N.H. 9541982 N.H. LEXIS 498

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Memorandum Opinion

This appeal raises an issue under RSA 354-A:4 as to the number of commissioners which satisfies the requirement of a quorum for decisions rendered by the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights (commission). We hold that a quorum of the commission consists of three commissioners.

A hearing was held on November 21, 1980, upon a complaint brought by Reggie Brown charging racial discrimination by the P. F. Avery Corporation. Three commissioners sat and heard the evidence. Before the decision was rendered, one of the three commissioners resigned. The remaining two commissioners rendered a decision which was favorable to Brown and from which the Corporation appealed, arguing, inter alia, that a quorum had not existed. The appeal was heard before a Master (Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq.), whose decision was approved by Nadeau, J. The matter was remanded to the commission to be reviewed by “the entire commission based on the records ....”

The legislature has provided that “[t]hree members of the commission shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting the business thereof.” RSA 354-A:4. The business of the commission includes the decision-making process as well as the hearing of complaints. Because this complaint was decided with less than the requisite number of commissioners, the decision is void. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand the case to the trial court for an order that the complaint be heard again and decided by a quorum of not less than three commissioners.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list