TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lindsley v. Boyle

Lindsley v. Boyle, 3 N.J.L. 207 (1807)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1807
Citations
3 N.J.L. 207
Summary
ON CERTIORARI. A justice must record the name of jurors and witnesses.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

A number of reasons were assigned for the reversal of the judgment of the justice; all of them complaining of the irregularity of the justice keeping his docket. The sixth, was as follows: Because the said justice did not enter oft the docket or record, the names of the jurors and witnesses, or any or either of them. This reason being, in point of fact, supported by the transcript of the justice sent up on the return of the certiorari, it was contended, on the part of the plaintiff in certiorari, who was the defendant below7, that this was a fatal error; that the act constituting Courts for the trial of Small Causes, in positive terms required it to be done; and that the reason and propriety of the thing called for it. And the Court being of that opinion,

Reversed the judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list