Blight v. Meeker
Deborah Blight against David Meeker and John I. Meeker
Blight v. Meeker, 7 N.J.L. 97 (1823)
Headnotes
It is improper to issue a warrant to arrest a female for debt, the process should be by summons.
Summary
ON CERTIORARI.
This is a certiorari to the Essex Common Pleas, to bring up a judgment given by the Common Pleas upon an appeal from the court for the trial of small causes. From the justice’s transcript and papers sent up, it appeared, that one of the plaintiffs went before the justice and made oath of their debt, and that they would be in danger of losing their debt if process against the defendant should be by summons ; ‘that the justice thereupon issued a warrant against, the defendant, for one hundred dollars; that the constable, on the same day, arrested the defendant, and took a bond, with .security, for her appearance before the justice, to answer, &c. The defendant appeared before the justice, and pleaded, that she was a female, and. not liable to be arrested by warrant; which plea the justice overruled, and, after hearing’ the proof in support of the plaintiffs’ account, gave judgment in their favor for ninety-nine dollars and ninety-two-cents, debt, and seventy-eight cents, costs.
The defendant appealed, and upon the trial of the appeal before the Common Pleas, the appellant (who is the plaintiff’ in certiorari) moved to non-suit the appellees, upon the same ground taken before the justice, to wit, that the appellant, being a female, was not liable to be arrested by warrant; which motion the court overruled, and affirmed the judgment of the justice, with costs, &c.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Both the courts did wrong; an arrest is-an imprisonment, and comes within the meaning of the act.The issuing of a warrant against a woman was therefore-improper.
Let the judgment be reversed.-
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.