Freeborn v. Denman
Thomas Freeborn against John Denman
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Kirkpatrick, C. J.
We are- all of opinion, that this demurrer is supported; that an assignment of errors is a proper subject of demurrer, and that you cannot assign error in fact and error in law together. If you think that the assignment of errors may be amended, wo will hear you on that subject.
Scudder then applied for leave to amend the assignment of errors, and cited 1 Arch. Prac. 215; Fitzg. 268, and Rev. Laws 140-1, to shew that the court had the power to grant the rule to amend.
Ber Curiam.
You may take your rule ^to amend, on payment of costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.