TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Den ex rel. Van Arsdalen v. Hull

Den ex dem. Van Arsdalen v. James Hull

Den ex rel. Van Arsdalen v. Hull, 9 N.J.L. 390 (1828)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 15, 1828
Judges
Ford
Citations
9 N.J.L. 390
Headnotes
In all cases where the court ha,ve expressed an opinion upon any matter, it can be reviewed only by a rule to sbew cause.
Summary
EJECTMENT. At the last Middlesex circuit, after the plaintiff had closed his evidence the court ordered a non-suit. The postea was returned and filed, and judgment nisi ordered.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ford

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ford, J.,

said, that in all cases where the court had expressed an opinion upon a matter, it would not be reviewed on motion, but there must be a rule to shew cause.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2001: 220012026peak 2001 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list