TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua

DEN ex dem. THOMAS PETERSON, DODO PETERSON, JOSIAH SPARKS AND WIFE, AND OTHERS against JOHN BOQUA AND DAVID SMITH

Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua, 10 N.J.L. 192 (1828)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1828
Citations
10 N.J.L. 192
Headnotes
This court will not order the plaintiffs to give security for costs upon the ground that but one of the plaintiffs resides in this state, and that he had several years before the commencement of the suit taken the benefit of the insolvent law.
Summary
A. L. Eakin, In behalf of the defendants produced an affidavit showing that all the lessors of the plaintiff, except Josiah Sparks and wife, are residents of the states of Pennsylvania and Delaware, and that Sparks was insolvent, and had been discharged under the insolvent laws in 1820 ; and thereupon moved that the proceedings in the cause be stayed, until security be given for the payment of costs. It was contended that although the case did not come within the words of the statute, yet that it was within the equitable principles by which the action of ejectment is regulated.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court.

The fact of insolvency, if wo are authorised to extend the provision of the statute, on principles of equitable construction, is not sufficiently made out. Though insolvent in 1820, the time to which the affidavit relates, Sparks may be quite otherwise in 1827, when this suit was commenced. In a case reported in Penn. Hep. 866, this court overruled an application for security for costs, one of the several lessors of the plaintiff, being a resident in the state. Motion overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list