State v. Webster
THE STATE against JAMES WEBSTER
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Ch. Justice.
We are all of opinion that this indictment was rightly quashed by the Court of Quarter Sessions. The manner in which a license is obtained, is in part directed by the act of 1797, and in part by the act of 1820, and does not depend exclusively upon either. This indictment alleges, that the defendant did not obtain “ a license in the manner directed by the act concerning inns and taverns.” To say that he had not obtained a license according to the act concerning inns and taverns, (which is the act of 1797) is not sufficient, for that act does not alone prescribe the mode of obtaining license. It is in part prescribed by the act of 1820. Therefore to negative the former act only,.is not sufficient.
*295 We express ao opinion as to the manner in which the indictment comes before us, as no objection has been made to the bringing: of it here by certiorari, on the part of the state, after „ . , , 1 ftaving been quashed in the Court oí Quarter bessions.
The quashing of the indictment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.