TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Webster

THE STATE against JAMES WEBSTER

State v. Webster, 10 N.J.L. 293 (1829)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 15, 1829
Citations
10 N.J.L. 293
Headnotes
An indictment for selling liquor by small measure, Which prayrisge. that the defendant, did not obtain a license according, to the act concerning Inns ana Taverns, is msutlicient anu win ac qaaeaecuc^. m-- "
Summary
This indictment had been quashed by the Court of Quarter Sessions of the county of Somerset, for insufficiency, and was thereupon removed by the prosecutor for the state, into this Court by certiorari. The indictment was in the following words'? M Somerset County, ss. The grand inquest" for the state of New-Jersey, and for the body of the county of Somerset upoti their oath present: That James Webster late of the township of Bridgwater, in the said county of Somerset,, on the tweutyfifth day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven, at the township of Bridgwater aforesaid in said county, and within the jurisdiction of this court, with force and arms, &zc. did sell, and knowingly cause and permit to be sold for his own account and benefit, to one Abraham Van Duyn, one half pint of ardent spirits, commonly called whiskey, the same being of less-measure than one quart; he the said James Webster, not having first obtained a license for that, purpose, from the Court of General Quarter Sessions of the Peace of said county of Somerset, in the manner directed by the act concerning Inns and Taverns, nor from the corporate authority of any city or borough, in which he resided, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace of this state, the government, and dignity of the. samé.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ch. Justice.

We are all of opinion that this indictment was rightly quashed by the Court of Quarter Sessions. The manner in which a license is obtained, is in part directed by the act of 1797, and in part by the act of 1820, and does not depend exclusively upon either. This indictment alleges, that the defendant did not obtain “ a license in the manner directed by the act concerning inns and taverns.” To say that he had not obtained a license according to the act concerning inns and taverns, (which is the act of 1797) is not sufficient, for that act does not alone prescribe the mode of obtaining license. It is in part prescribed by the act of 1820. Therefore to negative the former act only,.is not sufficient.

*295 We express ao opinion as to the manner in which the indictment comes before us, as no objection has been made to the bringing: of it here by certiorari, on the part of the state, after „ . , , 1 ftaving been quashed in the Court oí Quarter bessions.

The quashing of the indictment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list