Tanner v. Croxall

Hornblower, C. J.

The statute Elm. Dig. 424, enacts that it any attorney or solicitor shall charge in his bill of costs, for services not actually done; or for services not allowed by law; or take any greater fee or reward for services rendered, than is allowed by law, he shall pay to the party aggrieved, §30, to ho recovered by an action of debt. The complaint in this case is that the defendant has charged for services not actually performed ; and it is not necessary that the plaintiff should aver in the declaration that such charges were knowingly or wilfully made. Nor is it necessary that the plaintiff before he brings his action should appeal from the taxation of the clerk, if there was one, and establish the over — or the unfounded charge, upon a relaxation. It is not necessary that the hill should be taxed at all, in order to entitle the plaintiff to recover; nor does it appear by the pleadings in this case, whether the hill of costs was or was not taxed by the clerk. The object of the statute is to guard suitors against impositions by Attornies and Solicitors ; and if the suitor is charged in the hill of costs delivered to him, for services not rendered, he is thereby aggrieved , for he must either pay the unlawful demand, though he may be a very incompetent judge of its legality, or subject himself to be proceeded against for it, by suit or by execution. The act intends to arrest such improper demands, in limine, and the attorney who does know, *334 or ought to know what services he has rendered, and what the Jaw allows him for such services, must at his peril make out and present a true bill. How far, an unintentional error, might subject an attorney to a penalty under the statute, it is not now necessary to decide.

' The other cause assigned for demurrer, although true as a legal proposition, constitutes no objection to the declaration. In this action and upon the matters set forth in this declaration or bill of privilege, the plaintiff can recover at most, but for one penalty.

The words of the statute are, that if theattorney “shall charge in his bill of costs, for services not done, &c.” he shall pay to the party aggrieved, $30; not $30 for each and every wrong charge, but for charging in his bill, for services not performed, whether more or less in number. The plaintiff therefore at most, can recover but $30 in this case, if at all; nevertheless the demurrer must be over-ruled, with costs.

Demurrer overruled, with costs.