Cooley v. Chosen Freeholders
Cooley v. The Chosen Freeholders of Essex
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by The Chief Justice.
This action is brought to recover damages for an injury sustained by the plaintiff by reason of an alleged defect in a public bridge constructed by the defendants. The defendants demur to the declaration. The simple question raised by the demurrer is, the liability of the defendants to respond for such injury.
The case falls directly within the authority of the Freeholders of Sussex v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 . It was ruled, in that case, after an elaborate investigation, that no action lies by an individual against the board of chosen freeholders for injuries sustained in consequence of their not completing or keeping in repair a county bridge. We find nothing in the cases cited at the bar to shake the authority of that case.
The defendants are entitled to judgment upon the demurrer.
Cited in Livermore v. Freeholders of City of Camden, 5 Dutch. 246; Livermore v. Freeholders of Camden, 2 Vr. 508 ; Pray v. Mayor, &c., of Jersey City, 3 Vr. 397 , 398.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.