State v. Nunn
THE STATE, SARAH WYCKOFF, PROSECUTRIX v. M. R. NUNN, COLLECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, IN THE COUNTY OF WARREN
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Van Syckel, J.
One John C. Miller executed a mortgage on the farm on which he resides, in the township of Washington, in the comity of Warren, to the executors of Simon Wyckoff, deceased, to secure to them the payment of the sum of $6500 at the decease of the prosecutrix, Sarah *423 Wyckoff, the interest to be paid to the executors annually during her lifetime. This annual interest is paid by said executors to said Sarah in lieu of her right of dower in the estate of said decedent.
Under color of the act of April 17th, 1876, (Laws, 1876, p. 160,) the prosecutrix, who resided in Belvidere, was assessed in the year 1876, in the township of Washington, for the principal sum of said mortgage. She had no notice that this assessment was made against her, and therefore had no opportunity to apply to the commissioners of appeal for relief. She has, therefore, prosecuted this certiorari to review the assessment, and she is entitled to have it set aside if it is illegally imposed upon her. It is manifest that this assessment, as against the prosecutrix, is wholly unauthorized. Neither the principal or interest is payable to her; the principal is not due until her death, and the interest is payable to the executors, and is by them paid to her. If the interest had, by the terms of the mortgage, been payable to her, the case would be within the rule in State, Hill, pros., v. Hanson, Collector, 7 Vroom 50 , and she would have been taxable upon the amount of interest which had become due and was unpaid upon the mortgage at the time of the assessment.
The assessment should be set aside, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.