Garbett v. Mountford
WILLIAM GARBETT v. LYDIA M. Van F. MOUNTFORD
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Garrison, J.
Counsel have argued by briefs a motion to vacate a rule issued by a justice of this court in vacation discharging a rule to show cause why a writ of attachment issued out of this court should not be quashed.
*578 The motion is improper and brings nothing before ús. Either the proceeding before the single justice was nugatory, in which ease the rule to show cause has not been disposed of, or else the justice heard the rule by consent, sitting for this branch of the Supreme Court, in which case his decision is not subject to review. The matter is not one of those that can be reviewed as a motion made before a single justice, as was the case in Key v. Paul, 32 Vroom 133 .
The motion is denied, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.