TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Treeftz v. Board of Excise Commissioners

DAVID TREEFTZ, PROSECUTOR v. THE BOARD OF EXCISE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE AND EUGENE M. BEAUMONT

Treeftz v. Bd. of Excise Comm'rs, 62 A. 1004 (N.J. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 26, 1906
Judges
Garrbtson, Garrison, Swayze
Citations
62 A. 100473 N.J.L. 27844 Vroom 2781906 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 163
Headnotes
A resolution of the board of excise commissioners transferring a liquor license to one of its members who was present and voted for the resolution is voidable upon certiorari.
Summary
On certiorari.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Garrison

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The opinion of the court-was delivered by ' Garrison, J.

This writ brings up a resolution of the board of excise commissioners of the city of Lambertville transferring a liquor license to the defendant Eugene M. Beaumont, one of the members of the board.

At the meeting at which the resolution was adopted five members of the board were present and voted upon the resolution, three for and two against its adoption, the transferee being one of the three. This statement is sufficient to condemn the resolution, which, inasmuch as it did not lay down a general rule, but, on the contrary, granted a special privilege, was in its nature judicial as distinguished from legislative. Traction Company v. Board of Public Works, 27 Vroom 431 .

In the case cited an ordinance of a municipal board was set aside because one of its voting members was a stockholder in the corporation to which a special privilege was granted by the ordinance, although the vote of such member was not *279 needed to pass the ordinance; a fortiori must the same result follow when the voting member is the person actually benefited by a resolution, to the adoption of which his vote was necessary.

The resolution is set aside, wi'th costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11973: 219522026peak 1973 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Bd. of Pub. Works, 29 A. 163 (N.J. 1894) 32

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list