TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atlantic City v. Rollins

ATLANTIC CITY v. ANNIE ROLLINS

Atl. City v. Rollins, 69 A. 964 (N.J. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 8, 1908
Judges
Garrison
Citations
69 A. 96476 N.J.L. 25447 Vroom 2541908 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 88
Headnotes
A statute authorizing the prosecution of the offence of keeping a disorderly house otherwise than upon an indictment by the grand jury is invalid on constitutional grounds.
Summary
On certiorari.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Garrison

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

*255 The opinion of the court was'delivered by Garrison, J.

This certiorari brings up a. judgment rendered by the recorder of Atlantic City convicting the prosecutrix of keeping a disorderly house. "The complaint was that the prosecutrix kept a- disorderly house. It is said that the conviction is authorized by city ordinance and that such ordinance is authorized by “An act relating to, regulating and providing for the government of cities.” Pamph. L. 1902, p. 284.

If the statute cited or any other statute purports to authorize the prosecution and conviction of the offence of keeping a disorderly house otherwise than upon an indictment by the grand jury, such statute is invalid upon constitutional grounds. This is established in-this court by the case of State v. Anderson, 11 Vroom 224 .

The conviction is set aside.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11953: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Maier99 A.2d 21 (N.J. 1953)
  2. Blazier v. Keffer75 A. 439 (N.J. 1910)

Most recent

  1. State v. Maier99 A.2d 21 (N.J. 1953)
  2. Blazier v. Keffer75 A. 439 (N.J. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list