TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lincks v. Erie Railroad

REGINA LINCKS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HENRY W. LINCKS v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY

Lincks v. Erie R.R., 116 A. 493 (N.J. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1922
Citations
116 A. 49397 N.J.L. 3431922 N.J. LEXIS 207

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trbxchakd, Bergen, Kalisch, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackbrson, Van Busk irk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11980: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Hudson United Bank493 F. Supp. 434 (D.N.J. 1980)
  2. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Popovich107 A.2d 345 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Hudson United Bank493 F. Supp. 434 (D.N.J. 1980)
  2. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Popovich107 A.2d 345 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list