TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Cash Register Co. v. Caillias

Nat'l Cash Register Co. v. Caillias, 84 N.Y.S. 166 (1903)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 22, 1903
Judges
MacLean
Citations
84 N.Y.S. 166
Headnotes
1. Bailment—Failure to Return Property—Liability. Where defendant, by written agreement, promises to hold himself responsible in a certain sum for the return of a register, his liability on default is the amount fixed in the agreement.
Summary
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District. Action by the National Cash Register Company against Frederic C. Caillias. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — MacLean

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MacLEAN, J.

The defendant hired from the plaintiff a cash register for the summer season of 1902, from June 26 to September 26, 1902, at Coney Island, and agreed in writing to hold himself responsible to the plaintiff in the sum of $100 for its safe custody, and for its safe and peaceable return. He did not return it, and when its return was demanded from him he said he could not, as he did not know where it was. As he testified, he had left Coney Island on September 5th. Then the cash register was in the kitchen. Later it could not be found. Just when it disappeared from the premises was not shown. Some testimony was indulgently received upon abortive attempts to vary the written evidence of the defendant’s obligation, and to limit his liability by notice. It was all incompetent. As the learned justice held, however, the liability of the defendant was in the amount fixed by him in his express agreement of bailment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 11932: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Zaidens v. Salter142 Misc. 439 (1932)
  2. Butler v. Savin24 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 443 (Oh. Super. Ct., Cinci. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Zaidens v. Salter142 Misc. 439 (1932)
  2. Butler v. Savin24 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 443 (Oh. Super. Ct., Cinci. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list