TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kronenberger v. Quinn

Kronenberger v. Quinn, 86 N.Y.S. 139 (1904)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 7, 1904
Judges
Giederseeeve
Citations
86 N.Y.S. 139
Headnotes
1. Real Estate Agent—Action fob Commissions. Under Pen. Code, § 640d, making it a misdemeanor to attempt to earn commissions for the sale of real estate without written authority, plaintiff, who had no written authority, cannot raise the question of waiver of the written authority, in an action to recover commissions therefor.
Summary
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District. Action by Philip Kronenberger against Thomas J. Quinn. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Giederseeeve

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GIEDERSEEEVE, J.

The action is for broker’s commissions on sale of real estate. It is undisputed that plaintiff had no written authority to offer the property for sale. The complaint was properly dismissed. Whiteley v. Terry, 83 App. Div. 197 , 82 N. Y. Supp. 89 . Appellant asserts that this formality was waived by the parties. Whether it be so or not, the plaintiff was guilty of a misdemeanor in attempting to earn commissions for the sale of real property without written authority, and he cannot recover a claim foundfed upon sérvices rendered in violation of law. Pen. Code, § 64od; Hall v. Coppell, 7 Wall. (U. S.) 542, 19 L. Ed. 244 ; Oscanyan v. Arms Co., 103 U. S. 261 , 26 L. Ed. 539 .

Judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sorenson v. Smith129 P. 757 (Or. 1913)

Most recent

  1. Sorenson v. Smith129 P. 757 (Or. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Oscanyan v. Arms Co., 103 U.S. 261 (1881) 517
Whiteley v. Terry, 83 A.D. 197 (1903) 21
Coppell v. Hall, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 542 (1869) 122

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list