TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sumner v. Principi

W. T. SUMNER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee

Sumner v. Principi, 14 Vet. App. 309 (Vet. App. 2001)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
April 3, 2001
Docket
No. 99-0368
Judges
Kramer, Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Steinberg, Greene
Citations
14 Vet. App. 3092001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 3612001 WL 322716

Opinion — Per Curiam

*310 ORDER PER CURIAM:

On August 9, 2000, the Court, by a single-judge order, dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, the appellant’s application for an award of attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). On September 29, 2000, a panel denied the appellant’s motion for a panel decision and denied, as premature, his motion for a full Court decision. On October 17, 2000, the appellant filed a motion for panel reconsideration or, in the alternative, for a full Court decision.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion for reconsideration, it is by the panel ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration by the panel is DENIED.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s renewed motion for a full Court decision, because the resolution of Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. W. Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Res., 203 F.3d 819 (4th Cir.) (table), cert. granted, 530 U.S. 1304 , 121 S.Ct. 28 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1050 (2000) (mem.), argued, 2001 WL 219427 , No. 99-1848 (Feb. 27, 2001), may affect the disposition of this appeal, it is by the full Court ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for a full Court decision is held in abeyance pending further order of the Court. It is further ORDERED that, within 30 days after the U.S. Supreme Court’s disposition of Buckhannon, supra, the appellant file and serve a legal memorandum addressing the resolution of that proceeding as it pertains to the appellant’s EAJA application. It is further ORDERED that the Secretary file and serve a legal memorandum within 30 days after service of the appellant’s legal memorandum.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2001: 120012026peak 2001 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sumner v. Principi15 Vet. App. 256 (Vet. App. 2001)

Most recent

  1. Sumner v. Principi15 Vet. App. 256 (Vet. App. 2001)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list