TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Zanesville & Western Railway Co. v. Williams

Zanesville & Western Railway Company v. Charles E. Williams, Administrator, etc.

Zanesville & Western Ry. Co. v. Williams, 248 U.S. 533 (1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 4, 1918
Docket
No. 457
Citations
248 U.S. 53339 S. Ct. 1863 L. Ed. 4061918 U.S. LEXIS 1620
Summary
Error to the Court of Appeals of Muskingum County, State of Ohio.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed

for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726 . Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 119322026peak 1932 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corporation142 So. 87 (Ala. 1932)

Most recent

  1. State v. Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corporation142 So. 87 (Ala. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list