TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod

United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod, Commissioner of Immigration

United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod, 267 U.S. 571 (1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 13, 1925
Docket
No. 698
Citations
267 U.S. 57145 S. Ct. 22769 L. Ed. 7931925 U.S. LEXIS 390
Cited by 8

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Certiorari to’ the Circuit Court’ of Appeals for the Second ^Circuit.

Judgrnent reversed with costs; and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York-with directions'• to discharge the petitioner,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1927: 11948: 11961: 11972: 11973: 11982: 11984: 11998: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Harris v. United States (In re Harris)228 B.R. 740 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1998)
  2. People v. Gaggi104 A.D.2d 422 (1984) · Concurrence
  3. Klapholz v. Esperdy201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)
  4. Childs v. Philpot487 S.W.2d 637 (Ark. 1972)
  5. the Extradition of Chan Kam-Shu, a Fugitive From the Justice of the Republic of Liberia. United States of America v. Chan Kam-Shu477 F.2d 333 (5th Cir. 1973)
  6. People v. Morales440 N.E.2d 302 (Ill. App. Ct. 1982)

Most recent

  1. Harris v. United States (In re Harris)228 B.R. 740 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1998)
  2. People v. Gaggi104 A.D.2d 422 (1984) · Concurrence
  3. People v. Morales440 N.E.2d 302 (Ill. App. Ct. 1982)
  4. the Extradition of Chan Kam-Shu, a Fugitive From the Justice of the Republic of Liberia. United States of America v. Chan Kam-Shu477 F.2d 333 (5th Cir. 1973)
  5. Childs v. Philpot487 S.W.2d 637 (Ark. 1972)
  6. Klapholz v. Esperdy201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list