TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mayes v. Industrial Accident Board

Mayes v. Industrial Accident Board of Michigan

Mayes v. Indus. Accident Bd., 278 U.S. 568 (1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 26, 1928
Docket
No. 531
Citations
278 U.S. 56849 S. Ct. 8373 L. Ed. 5101928 U.S. LEXIS 354

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, -finds that there is. no federal question upon which certiorari can be issued, application for which is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the; order of October 29, 1926.,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11957: 11959: 11976: 11992: 12002: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Satoko Matsumoto v. Tatsuya Matsumoto792 A.2d 1222 (N.J. 2002)
  2. Irvin v. State139 N.E.2d 898 (Ind. 1957)
  3. Palmer v. Fitzpatrick557 P.2d 203 (Idaho 1976)
  4. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Metropolitan Baltimore, Inc. v. Public Service Commission614 A.2d 1006 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992)
  5. Cramer v. Driesbach287 P.2d 981 (Idaho 1955)
  6. Yeakel v. Meyer337 P.2d 597 (Idaho 1959)

Most recent

  1. Satoko Matsumoto v. Tatsuya Matsumoto792 A.2d 1222 (N.J. 2002)
  2. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Metropolitan Baltimore, Inc. v. Public Service Commission614 A.2d 1006 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992)
  3. Palmer v. Fitzpatrick557 P.2d 203 (Idaho 1976)
  4. Yeakel v. Meyer337 P.2d 597 (Idaho 1959)
  5. Irvin v. State139 N.E.2d 898 (Ind. 1957)
  6. Cramer v. Driesbach287 P.2d 981 (Idaho 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list