Wilson v. McLane
Wilson v. McLane and Harvie, doing business under the name and Style of Automatic Sales Company v. Heise
Wilson v. McLane, 279 U.S. 822 (1929)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The appeals are dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question, on the authority of Miller v. Cornwall R. R., 168 U. S. 131, 134 ; Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263 ; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 665 .
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[Insurance Law of New York (Consol.Laws, c. 28) section 55a (a statute nearly identical to D.C.Code Ann. § 31-4716(a))
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals9
- Federal District Courts10
- Bankruptcy Courts3
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- State v. LOUIS UNION TRUST CO.
- MacKay v. State
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbia
- Witters v. United States
- Hygrade Envelope Corp., Bankrupt. Samuel S. Baranow, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Hygrade Envelope Corp. v. Gibraltar Factors Corp.
- Jason E. Pearl, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Herman Goldberg, A.K.A. Hymy Goldberg v. Herman Goldberg, Bankrupt
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.