Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569 ; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720 ; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147 . Treating the papers'whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for. certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial- Code, as amended by the Act of February *532 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936 , 938), certiorari is denied.
Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant. Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.