TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States

Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 391 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Court of International Trade · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
August 23, 2005
Docket
No. 03-00828
Judges
Pogue
Citations
391 F. Supp. 2d 132629 C.I.T. 95027 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 24632005 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 113

Opinion

391 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2005)

NORSK HYDRO CANADA, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant, and

U.S. Magnesium, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor.

Slip Op. 05-102, Court No. 03-00828.

United States Court of International Trade.

August 23, 2005.

JUDGMENT

POGUE, Judge.

In Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 29 CIT ___ , Slip Op. 05-58 (May 17, 2005), this court remanded Commerce's determination in Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from Canada, 68 Fed.Reg. 53,962 (Dep't Commerce Sept. 15, 2003) (final results of countervailing duty administrative review) to "`review and determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy,' and specifically [to] `ensure that the amount of the countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the countervailable subsidy.'" Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc., 29 CIT at ___, Slip Op. 05-58 at 2 (quoting 19 U.S.C. § 1675 (a) and Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, 28 CIT ___ , 350 F.Supp.2d 1172, 1186 (2005)). On July 18, 2005, Commerce issued a remand determination complying with the court's instructions.

After reviewing Commerce's remand determination, the parties' comments and the rebuttals thereto, and all other papers on file herein, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby *1327 ORDERED that the Department of Commerce's remand determination is sustained.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2006: 120062026peak 2006 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United StatesNo. 2006-1044 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2006)

Most recent

  1. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United StatesNo. 2006-1044 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. v. United States, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2004) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list