TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hoover Motor Express Co. v. Fort

Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Fort, Commissioner of Finance & Taxation

Hoover Motor Express Co. v. Fort, 293 U.S. 529 (1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
November 12, 1934
Docket
No. 491
Citations
293 U.S. 52955 S. Ct. 149

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Stephenson v. Binford, 287 U. S. 251, 264, 272, 275-276 ; Continental Baking Co. v. Woodring, 286 U. S. 352, 365-366, 369-371 ; Sproles v. Binford, 286 U. S. 374, 388-389, 391-396 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Sproles v. Binford, 286 U.S. 374 (1932) 412
Stephenson v. Binford, 287 U.S. 251 (1932) 231
Cont'l Baking Co. v. Woodring, 286 U.S. 352 (1932) 167

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list