Bell Telephone Co. v. Van Dyke
Bell Telephone Co. v. Van Dyke, Secretary of the Department of Highways
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein, is dismissed for the reason that the decision of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 162, 165 ; Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111 ; Mobile, J. & K. C. R. Co. v. Mississippi, 210 U. S. 187, 204 ; Lowry v. Silver City G. & S. Mining Co., 179 U. S. 196, 198 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.