Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband
Chase Securities Corp. v. Husband, Commissioner of Banks
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Appeal from the Superior Court of Massachusetts.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted. The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) First National Bank v. Missouri, 263 U. S. 640, 666 ; Lewis v. Fidelity Co., 292 U. S. 559, 566 ; Jennings v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 294 U. S. 216, 219 ; Hornblower v. McGray, ante, p. 655. (2) Hudson Water Co. v. McCarter, 209 U. S. 349, 357 ; Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, 240 U. S. 342, 363 ; Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia P. S. Corp., 248 U. S. 372, 375, 376 ; Home Bldg. & L. Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 437, 438 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.