Banke v. Novadel-Agene Corp.

Banke v. Novadel-Agene Corporation

Banke v. Novadel-Agene Corp., 317 U.S. 692 (1942)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: December 21, 1942
Docket: No. 527
Citations: 317 U.S. 69263 S. Ct. 32487 L. Ed. 55455 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 4931942 U.S. LEXIS 1182

Cited by 16 3 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit de *693 nied.

Mr. Ralph B. Lacey for petitioners. Mr. Clair W. Fairbank for respondent.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(defect in notice cured by a rehearing on the motion to set aside the permanent injunction)

State of Ill. v. Peters, 871 F.2d 1336 (7th Cir. 1989)
(mineral reservation in private deed)

Occidental Geothermal, Inc. v. Simmons, 543 F. Supp. 870 (N.D. Cal. 1982)

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

J. E. Stevens v. Hollie Vowell343 F.2d 374 (10th Cir. 1965)
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby Wear414 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1969)
United States v. Norman T.129 F.3d 1099 (10th Cir. 1997)
Martin Louie Johns v. United States227 F.2d 374 (10th Cir. 1955)
Hatchitt v. United States158 F.2d 754 (9th Cir. 1946)
Swan Carburetor Co. v. Chrysler Corporation149 F.2d 476 (6th Cir. 1945)

Most recent

United States v. Norman T.129 F.3d 1099 (10th Cir. 1997)
People of State of Illinois v. Peters871 F.2d 1336 (7th Cir. 1989)
People ex rel. Hartigan v. Peters871 F.2d 1336 (7th Cir. 1989)
Occidental Geothermal, Inc. v. Simmons543 F. Supp. 870 (N.D. Cal. 1982)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Growth Co., S.A.391 F. Supp. 593 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby Wear414 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list